What More Could The CMS Actuary Do For Its Annual Healthcare Spending Report?
Interesting Health Affairs Forefront Blog on what more the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Actuary could do in terms of analysis of National Healthcare Expenditures Data (NHED) each year. As the author notes, there are some crucial missing pieces that could aid analysis and reform.
- The NHED do not report prices by payer sector. We know that the commercial world is saddled with huge prices compared with the government sector. Interestingly, the author does note that healthcare inflation declined in a real sense. As I noted in a reent blog, the surge in overall spending was tied to utilization. That blog is here: https://www.healthcarelabyrinth.com/national-healthcare-expenditure-data-issued-for-2023-what-does-it-all-mean/ .
- The NHED do include estimates of the change in volume and intensity — overall and by provider sector. The author opines that: “What matters is the specifics of which prices could be reduced with little decline in access or quality and which care is not improving health. … Identifying opportunities for more efficient care delivery, and payment systems/delivery models that encourage those efficiencies to be realized, is crucial.”
- The NHED do not capture costs that are not funneled through providers or insurers. The commercial sector has vast costs in this area. Also, many activities directed toward studying and managing the complexity of the healthcare system are not counted.
(Article may require a subscription.)
#nhed #cms #healthcare #spending
