Newsfeed

Despite Some Cutbacks, MA Plans Are Going Big For Special Needs Plans

Given their potential for greater margin, Medicare Advantage (MA) plans appear to be making heavy investments in Special Needs Plans (SNPs) in 2025, even as they contract other products in certain areas. Done right, SNPs can generate 6.4% margins, compared with 2.8% for MA generally. This comes from 2021 data. As well, the plans are reacting to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) making the integration of Medicare and Medicaid funding streams a huge priority.

The growth continues a trend. SNP enrollment is about 6.6 million people this year, up 255% from 10 years ago, 125% from five years ago and 16% from 2023. SNP enrollment is projected to hit 7.2 million in 2025.

UnitedHealth Group, Humana, Elevance Health, CVS Health, Centene and Molina are all investing heavily. Some plans are contracting base benefits even in SNPs.

The growth is not without risk. CMS is undertaking heavy regulation of SNPs and could rein in risk adjustment (from which SNPs benefit a great deal). Significant new Medicare-Medicaid integration requirements are coming down the road as well.

(Article may require a subscription.)

#specialneedsplans #snps #medicareadvantage #cms #medicaid #medicare

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/insurance/humana-centene-unitedhealth-medicare-advantage-dsnp-snp-plans

Read More »

Harris Announces Medicare At Home, Expands Healthcare Agenda

Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris announced a new Medicare at Home initiative. She would provide home health aide and other in-home supports for seniors and the disabled in Medicare. This would extend the current scope of benefits officially from short-term home care to chronic home care. I have proposed a comprehensive long-term care program paid through Medicaid and with buy-ins by seniors.

As well, Harris wants to have hearing and vision coverage added to the traditional program.

She would pay for most of the initiatives by expanding Medicare drug price negotiations and instituting pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) reforms.

On other news, Harris is turning up the heat on Trump with a healthcare agenda. The Harris campaign thinks healthcare can be a swing issue and move undecideds to her side.

In addition, a new study in Health Affairs has found that, while Medicare Advantage (MA) extends coverage for dental, vision, and hearing care as supplemental benefits, low-income beneficiaries still face significant access barriers to these services. A survey of MA enrollees conducted in 2018 and 2019 found that 11% reported an unmet dental need, 4% had an unmet vision need and 2% had an unmet hearing need.

Additional articles: https://insidehealthpolicy.com/daily-news/harris-proposes-expanded-medicare-home-health-care-funded-new-drug-price-negotiations and https://www.beckerspayer.com/policy-updates/harris-pitches-medicare-home-care-coverage-3-notes.html and https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4922425-harris-adult-caregivers-medicare-benefit-at-home-care-sandwich-generation/ and https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4920490-harris-campaign-health-care-prioritizes/ and https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/many-ma-beneficiaries-have-dental-vision-or-hearing-benefits-access-gaps-remain-study-shows

(Some articles may require a subscription.)

#longtermcare #ltss #harris #trump #election2024 #homecare #supplementalbenefits #medicareadvantage #medicare

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/politics-policy/kamala-harris-medicare-home-care-the-view

Read More »

MA Fallout Much Greater Than CMS Indicates

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has reported that all is fine in the Medicare Advantage (MA) and standalone Part D worlds. But we know that is just not the case. It is political spin in an election year. We featured some good analysis last week about why choice will drop and some premiums and out-of-pocket costs will go up in standalone Part D.

Now, an analysis of MA shows a similar thing. Insurers are exiting geographic markets, reducing benefits, increasing premiums, and imposing higher out-of-pocket costs. An ATI Advisory analysis says more than 7% of beneficiaries, or about two million people, will need to find new offerings. This is up from fewer than 100,000 in past years. This is major displacement right around the election and is the October Surprise I have been talking about.

(Article may require a subscription.)

#medicareadvantage #healthplans #cms

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/insurance/medicare-advantage-aetna-humana-elevance-2025

Read More »

CBO Says Costs of Medicare Part D Changes Are Ballooning

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has updated its projections on the cost of the redesign of the Medicare Part D program passed by Democrats in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). I have argued in several blogs (see these: https://www.healthcarelabyrinth.com/part-d-premium-woes-due-to-the-inflation-reduction-act/ and https://www.healthcarelabyrinth.com/part-d-restructuring-in-inflation-reduction-act-could-have-huge-implications-on-standalone-part-d-program/ ) that Democrats did not think through the impact on both premiums over time as well as the stability of both Medicare Advantage (MA) and the standalone Part D (PDP) program. The generous out-of-pocket reductions would be paid by higher premiums and benefit changes since the government did not fund the policy changes. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) created an emergency demonstration program to stabilize premiums in 2025. But that only lasts for three years. I also think the program is extra-legal.

Now, the CBO is saying that the original estimates of the Part D changes have increased dramatically. It will cost $10 billion to $20 billion more next year than initially projected. In addition, the demonstration will cost another $5 billion in 2025.

(Article may require a subscription.)

#ira #partd #pdp #medicareadvantage #cms

https://www.statnews.com/2024/10/03/drug-pricing-law-higher-cost-cbo/

Read More »

United Healthcare Sues CMS on Call Center Measures For Star Year 2025

Interesting development already on Star Year 2025 even before the public announcement of results on 10/10.

In addition to a major drop in Stars for Humana for Star Year 2025, United Healthcare seems to have been hit with lower Stars and is now suing CMS. Humana has appeals on its ratings, too.

In the United case, the company is suing over what it says are arbitrary assessments of calls regarding timely connection to TTY or a foreign language translator as well as CMS asking the right questions and following procedures. Just one arguable assessment on a call by CMS for the Part C and D measures can cost you a higher score on those measures but also perhaps impact your overall score. This is what United says happened to them.

This builds on what happened in Star Year 2024, when Scan, Elevance Health, and some others successfully sued CMS and won a recalculation of Stars. Elevance also settled with CMS on a call center issue for 2024 Star and won increased ratings.

So, there is some hope that United and Humana could see higher scores if successful on appeal or in court.

Additional articles: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/cms-faces-another-star-ratings-lawsuit-time-unitedhealth and https://www.beckerspayer.com/payer/unitedhealthcare-sues-cms-over-1-phone-call.html

#medicareadvantage #stars #cms #unitedhealthcare

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/unitedhealth-sues-us-over-quality-rating-drop-tied-to-phone-call

Read More »

Trump Won’t Reintroduce Drug Price Reform

Donald Trump is backing away from his previous support for some form of drug price reform. In his first administration, Trump proposed drug price negotiations for Part B medical drugs in Medicare and the eventual cap of prices to international benchmarks. The U.S. would pay the lowest of other nations. He indicated he wanted to extend the concept to Part D retail drugs as well. The change is surprising given polls showing overwhelming support for drug price reform across Democrats, Independents, and Republicans. The reform was pulled back by the Biden administration due to rule-making issues and poor design.

(Article may require a subscription.)

#drugpricing #medicare #branddrugmakers

https://insidehealthpolicy.com/daily-news/trump-campaign-trump-won-t-pursue-most-favored-nation-policy-drugs

Read More »

Hospital Consolidation Has Meant Little Competition In Many Markets

A great Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) analysis shows the impact of massive hospital consolidation over the past many years. Nearly half (47%) of metropolitan areas had only one or two hospitals or health systems providing inpatient hospital care in 2022. About one in five (19%) metropolitan areas have only one hospital or health system providing hospital care. More than a quarter (27%) are controlled by two hospitals or systems.

Digging deeper, in 82% of metro areas, one or two hospitals or health systems were responsible for at least three quarters of all inpatient hospital discharges. This signifies these markets are highly concentrated under federal antitrust guidelines.

We know that hospital consolidation has led to major price increases. As well, hospitals and healthcare systems have acquired physician practices, raising prices for physician care by changing practice patterns to more expensive hospital locations.

Congress needs to intervene to stop further consolidation and pass site-neutral policies.

Press Release: https://www.kff.org/health-costs/press-release/nearly-half-of-metro-areas-have-only-one-or-two-hospitals-or-health-systems-providing-inpatient-care/

#hospitals #antitrust #manda #mergers #acquisitions

https://www.kff.org/health-costs/issue-brief/one-or-two-health-systems-controlled-the-entire-market-for-inpatient-hospital-care-in-nearly-half-of-metropolitan-areas-in-2022/

Read More »

Biden Administration Announced Q3 Drug Inflation Rebates

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that many Medicare enrollees will pay less for 54 drugs available through Medicare Part B. The drugs will have a lower Part B coinsurance rate from October 1, 2024 – December 31, 2024 because drug makers increased prices higher than applicable inflation.

Over 822,000 people with Medicare use these drugs annually to treat conditions such as cancer, osteoporosis, and pneumonia. The inflation cap and rebate were passed as part of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the same bill that has Medicare drug price negotiations. Savings on some drugs could be in the thousands.

Additional articles: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2024/09/30/hhs-announces-cost-savings-for-prescription-drugs-thanks-to-medicare-inflation-rebate-program.html and https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/hhs-releases-cost-savings-54-prescriptions-including-cancer-drug

#ira #drugpricing #branddrugmakers

https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4904127-medicare-savings-rebates-inflation-reduction-act

Read More »

CMS Says Medicare Advantage and Part D Stable For 2025

Contrary to everything we hear on the street, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is reporting that all is well in Medicare Advantage (MA) and the standalone Part D (PDP) program. It reports that the average monthly plan premium for all MA plans, which includes MA plans that provide prescription drug coverage and MA Special Needs Plans (SNPs), is projected to decrease from $18.23 in 2024 to $17.00 in 2025. It also says benefit options will remain stable. CMS says the average standalone Part D plan total premium is projected to decrease from $41.63 in 2024 to $40.00 in 2025 (a decrease of $1.63). This is largely due to the special demonstration program put in place by CMS when it saw standalone Part D premiums slated to skyrocket. It says approximately 99% of people with Medicare enrolled in a standalone Part D plan in 2024 are currently enrolled in a standalone Part D plan offered by a plan sponsor that opted into the demonstration for 2025. Why not – free government money! I still argue the program is extra-legal.

I tend to think CMS is painting the rosiest of pictures here. I do think there are benefit reductions, which allowed plans in major penetration areas to keep premiums stable. And likely high enrollment areas are masking the impact of benefit reductions and premium increases in certain areas that will be hit somewhat hard. There is a great deal of already reported geographic contraction, plan exits, and benefit changes from some of the nation’s largest plans. There also is some evidence of standalone Part D premium hikes in areas despite the stabilization program. If the program was able to keep weighted average premiums stable, no doubt the trend toward fewer choices, higher cost-sharing, and formulary changes will also occur.

We will see the real impact around the country come mid-October with the start of the enrollment season for 2025.

Additional articles: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/medicare-advantage-and-medicare-prescription-drug-programs-remain-stable-cms-implements-improvements

#medicareadvantage

https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/medicare-advantage-and-medicare-prescription-drug-programs-remain-stable-cms-implements-improvements

Read More »

WSJ Editorial Wrong On FTC Lawsuit On PBMs

I agree more with the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) editorial page than not, but the newspaper was dead wrong in an editorial yesterday on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) lawsuit against pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs).

On one hand, I understand the WSJ’s complaint that the FTC appears to be singling out the PBMs when rebates are legal in government-sponsored programs. I defend much of what PBMs do. The WSJ is right, too, that brand drug makers were effectively portrayed as victims.

The WSJ says the suit could lead to higher insurance costs and premiums, and notes that net insulin prices have come down over time. It also says PBMs should not be blamed if employer groups and health plans do not pass the rebate through to the consumer (some now do) and that rebates account for just a small share of profits. It then bemoans Obamacare for leading to vertical integration because it regulated profits via the minimum medical loss ratio (MLR) requirement.

I will have a blog soon that responds to the WSJ editorial, but quite simply WSJ has not thought out its free market position terribly well. In its rush to defend business, it misses the point that the drug channel and pricing system are anything but a free market. The opaqueness and perverse incentives in the channel raise prices and undermine competition in many ways. This leads to major costs for consumers and businesses (which pay a heavy load and need to compete in the global markets). Then there is the sheer dominance of the Big 3 PBMs. That certainly is not healthy for healthcare innovation.

At base, that is what the FTC is going after – admittedly a little clumsily. We can debate the fairness of the lawsuit on the PBMs, but change needs to occur. The WSJ should channel a little more of trustbuster Teddy Roosevelt. More soon.

#pbms #drugpricing #branddrugmakers #ftc #antitrust #consolidation #manda #mergers #acquisitions

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/federal-trade-commission-pharmacy-benefit-managers-insulin-43b0a974?st=XKDcP3&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

Read More »

Available Now

$30.00