curesact

Senate Passes One Big Beautiful Bill It was another wild all-nighter for the Senate GOP caucus Monday in its efforts to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill. But early afternoon Tuesday, the bill was finally passed and now goes back to the House. A conservative amendment to lower the federal matching percentage in expansion states did not have enough votes to pass. But in the end the conservatives except Rand Paul voted for the measure. Despite helping get a rural hospital fund to $50 billion, moderate Susan Collins voted against the bill along with Thom Tillis. All eyes Monday were on moderate Lisa Murkowski. She won some SNAP nutrition and Medicaid funding concessions in the bill for Alaska and, with the rural hospital fund increase, voted yes. That gave the bill 50 votes, allowing Vice President JD Vance to cast the tie-breaking vote for approval. Healthcare providers and health plans

Senate Acting On Budget Bill The Senate began debating the budget reconciliation bill and the process will go late into Monday at a minimum before any final vote. A procedural vote to open debate passed on a 51-49 vote Saturday, with conservative Rand Paul, R-KY, and pragmatic conservative Thom Tillis, R-NC, voting “no.” Paul likely will never support the bill due to debt concerns. The debt limit is actually hiked $5 trillion vs. $4 trillion earlier. Tillis opposes the deep Medicaid reductions. But the bill’s passage is by no means certain right now. A lot has to happen before final passage. The bill went through a wide-ranging debate over the weekend and a Vote-a-Rama (unlimited amendment offerings) started on Monday. Four other conservatives – Ron Johnson, R-WI, Rick Scott, R-FL, Mike Lee, R-UT, and Cynthia Lummis, R-WY – only voted “yes” on the bill after commitments from leaders that a

Victory For Preventive Services As expected, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of allowing preventive services to continue under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The majority was a mix of conservatives and liberals. The high court determined that members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which makes recommendations for coverage requirements under the ACA, are selected within the bounds of the Constitution. The court agreed that the task force is appointed by an executive appointee and could be replaced. The religious arguments on the provision of certain services were largely sidelined. Additional articles: https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/regulatory/scotus-upholds-aca-preventive-services-task-force-6-3-ruling and https://www.healthcaredive.com/news/supreme-court-aca-preventive-care-mandate-decision-braidwood-kennedy/751806/ and https://www.medpagetoday.com/primarycare/preventivecare/116288 and https://www.modernhealthcare.com/politics-regulation/mh-aca-preventive-care-ruling-reactions/ and https://thehill.com/homenews/ap/ap-business/ap-supreme-court-preserves-key-part-of-obamacare-coverage-requirements/?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%253D&tbref=hp (Some articles may require a subscription.) #prevention #preventiveservices #aca #obamacare https://www.modernhealthcare.com/politics-regulation/mh-supreme-court-aca-preventive-coverage Senate Schedules A Saturday Budget Vote, But Outcome Uncertain Changes to the Senate version of the budget reconciliation bill is due out Friday night and a vote to proceed on the bill is set for Saturday,

Budget Reconciliation Saga Continues With Parliamentarian Ruling President Donald Trump took to the so-called campaign trail today to advocate for passage of the tax-cutting Big Beautiful Bill and said he wants the legislation on his desk by July 4. But the “Byrd Bath” process and the Senate parliamentarian threw a monkey wrench into the works today. The parliamentarian, who interprets Senate rules (especially as they relate to the reconciliation process), agreed with Democrats that several provisions on healthcare are not allowable under the Byrd budget reconciliation process rules. In general, provisions in a budget reconciliation bill must be very germane to the process to allow the bill to pass in the Senate with a simple majority and not with a supermajoriy vote of 60. Majority Leader John Thune, R-SD, said he will not seek to overrule the parliamentarian on a majority vote for fear of setting a huge precedent for

Senate And House Jockey On Budget Bill Senate moderates and pragmatic conservatives are working on a rural hospital relief fund to offset the impact of numerous Medicaid and Exchange cuts in the budget reconciliation bill. Their chief complaint is that the $15 billion budget crafters are willing to put up is clearly inadequate. They believe a fund closer to $100 billion is needed to ensure the hospitals’ solvency. At least three senators are very vocal here, with others certainly sympathetic. One pragmatic conservative up for re-election, Thom Tillis, R-NC, believes that the healthcare cuts being considered in budget reconciliation will mean the GOP losing control of Congress. His seat is especially vulnerable as a popular moderate Democratic former governor, Roy Cooper, could challenge Tillis in 2026. Another major sticking point in discussions between the House and Senate is the status of the state and local taxes (SALT) deductions. Primarily to

Senate Budget Bill Could Be in Trouble Both sides of the House caucus declared that they could oppose the current Senate version of the budget reconciliation bill if it passes the upper chamber and returns to the House. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-SD, has an uprising in his own chamber between moderates and conservatives, but both sides of the House have already declared their concerns. More than a dozen House Republicans warned they won’t support the Senate’s version because the proposed Medicaid cuts are too steep. The Senate added more reductions in the area of provider taxes, state directed payments, and work requirements. This moderate opposition does not even fully take into account those who oppose the bill if the state and local tax deduction does not come back over with a generous increase. Right now, the Senate has no changes from the low $10,000 limit. On the conservative side,

Plans Announce PA Initiatives To Forestall Regulatory Action After commitments by Trump administration officials to reform prior authorization (PA), about fifty health plans, including some of the biggest, met with Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz to unveil their plans to streamline PA and tackle claims denials. The health plans represent as many as 75% of America’s insured. The Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association and trade group AHIP also attended the meeting. Health plans will commit to reduce the number of codes that are subject to PA and to establish a standard framework to increase how many authorizations are adjudicated electronically and in real time. PA changes will occur by 1/1/2026, with electronic PA reforms in one year later. The plans also will increase education on PA and appeals, accountability, and transparency around

Budget Reconciliation In Senate Still In Limbo After going to bat for deeper healthcare cuts for conservatives, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-SD, is facing an uprising on the right and left. Three conservatives – Mike Lee, Rick Scott, and Ron Johnson, are threatening to be off the bill unless deeper cuts occur, including in healthcare. Rand Paul appears already against the bill due to a provision that increases the debt limit. This would sink the bill. At the same time, at least three moderates or pragmatists – Lisa Murkowski, Josh Hawley, and Susan Collins – remain very concerned about the depth of certain cuts, especially provider tax restrictions. Thune wants to vote on the bill next week. Rural providers, particularly hospitals, continue to argue the bill jeopardizes their livelihoods and that hospitals in under-served areas could shutter. An impasse over the state and local tax deduction threatens passage of

Opposition To Healthcare Cuts In Budget Bill All of healthcare is lining up against the cuts to healthcare in the budget reconciliation bill. A new study from the Urban Institute and Robert Wood Johnson (RWJ) Foundation breaks down how providers (hospitals, physicians, and drugs) are impacted in each state by the reductions to Medicaid and the Exchanges. Over the next decade, the bill would decrease spending by $321 billion to hospitals, $81 billion to physicians and $191 billion for drugs. Spending for other healthcare services would decline by $205 billion. If the Exchange premium tax credits expire, spending would decline by an additional $262 billion — hospitals an additional $103 billion cut, physicians an additional $39 billion cut, and drugs an additional $50 billion cut. Spending on other healthcare services would drop an additional $70 billion. Now, I have little doubt on the math of what Urban and RWJ did.

Budget Reconciliation Bill Flounders Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who won his position with backing from prominent conservatives, threw his weight behind budget-cutters in the reframing in the Senate of the House bill. But the move seems to have backfired on him. He has two conservative holdouts on the bill. He also has an uprising from moderates and pragmatic conservatives due to the Medicaid reductions, which are even deeper than the House had included. Thune essentially ignored a fundamental part of his caucus. The moderates are worried about impacts on states and providers as well as what will happen to the uninsured rate. At least three moderates or pragmatic conservatives – Josh Hawley, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski – have been vocal on the cuts and expressed doubts about voting for the bill. But there are still others that could vote against them due to the Medicaid cuts. Right now,