Uncategorized

Paragon Institute Sees Fraud In Enhanced Premium Subsidies As Democrats are calling for the extension or permanent adoption of enhanced premium subsidies in the Exchange, the conservative Paragon Institute is arguing that the enhanced premium subsidies are creating fraud as enrollees and/or brokers misrepresent income to get better subsidies. They say this is occurring very much in the 100% to 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL) income group, where free premiums are offered under the enhancement. Paragon says the original subsidies should be put back in place to lessen fraud. In addition, Paragon says small business coverage has eroded since the enhanced subsidies have been in effect. There is fraud going on in the program, with brokers illegally signing people up or changing their plans. But Paragon is now raising a different issue of fraud – the true misrepresentation of income. Paragon also raised a possible compromise. While it

Near Final Medicaid Redetermination Data In The Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) has done a great public service tracking and explaining the fallout over the reintroduction of Medicaid redeterminations. While some states will carry out remaining redeterminations into 2025, we are nearing the end of the journey. About 25 million people were disenrolled for some period of time since redeterminations began again in April 2023. There is some good news and bad news to the near-end of this redetermination story. The pause in redeterminations during the pandemic allowed rolls to grow in Medicaid and children’s health insurance to 94 million. Even with losses, almost 10 million more people are covered now than before the pandemic. At the same time, 13 million have lost Medicaid coverage since the peak. Many but not all have gained coverage in other ways. Kaiser Family Foundation press release: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/press-release/as-medicaid-unwinding-concludes-in-most-states-kff-finds-25-million-lost-medicaid-coverage-but-enrollment-is-10-million-higher-than-pre-pandemic-levels/ #medicareadvantage #walmart #humana #primarycare https://www.beckerspayer.com/leadership/why-centerwell-is-moving-into-walmart.html?utm_medium=email&utm_content=newsletter HRSA Notifies

Fireworks At Senate Finance Hearing On Healthcare Fireworks erupted at the Senate Finance hearing on various healthcare issues. Supporters of the Inflation Reduction Act’s (IRA) Medicare drug price negotiations say it is a good first step and will reduce drug costs in the country. Opponents argue it will impact innovation and Part D changes will increase premiums. Others attacked GOP VP candidate J.D. Vance’s explanation of what a Trump Obamacare repeal may look like – principally setting up risk pools for those who are sick. On enhanced premiums, many support their extension, but the GOP discussed the huge price tag. Both parties seemed to favor pharmacy benefit manager reform. #healthcare #election2024 #healthcarereform https://www.fiercehealthcare.com/payers/lawmakers-policy-experts-spar-over-inflation-reduction-act Trump and GOP At Odds Over Medicare Drug Price Negotiations Interesting article from Axios on the divide between Donald Trump and GOP members of Congress on the Medicare drug price negotiations law. The lawmakers are doing the

JD Vance Seemingly Flips on Obamacare And Says Trump Has A Repeal Plan As a senatorial candidate and even as a senator, GOP VP nominee JD Vance poo-pooed the idea of repealing the popular Affordable Care Act (ACA). He argued the program was helping many working Americans. It was a compassionate argument that many viewed as novel in the GOP. But on a Sunday news show, Vance said that Trump has a repeal plan and its cornerstone appears to be the old conservative policy of removing sicker populations from most insurance and putting them in high-risk pools. Despite Vance saying people would be protected, it certainly raises the issue of what happens to people with pre-existing conditions – both from a coverage and affordability standpoint. Such high-risk pools rarely worked as they did not protect patients with pre-existing conditions, were not funded correctly, and had exorbitant premiums. The GOP argues